|
TENNESSEE LAW REVIEW
Member of the National Conference
of Law Review
| Volume 70 |
Fall 2002 |
Number1 |
CONTENTS
| ARTICLES |
|
| THE
ETHICAL AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE LAWYER FOR
THE CORPORATION IN RESPONDING TO FRAUDULENT CONDUCT BY CORPORATE
OFFICERS OR AGENTS |
CHIEF
JUSTICE E. NORMAN VEASEY |
| ETHICS
2000 AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: THE MORE THINGS CHANGE . . .
. |
CHARLES
W. WOLFRAM |
| THE
LAWYER AS CONSENSUS BUILDER: ETHICS FOR A NEW PRACTICE |
CARRIE
MENKEL-MEADOW |
| VARIATIONS
ON A BASIC THEME: REVISITING THE ABA=S REVISION OF MODEL RULE
4.2 (Part I) |
CARL
A. PIERCE |
|
|
| COMMENTS |
|
| BURYING
THE HATCHET: DO TENNESSEE=S NEW SCREENING RULES LEAVE THE CLINARD
HANDLE STICKING OUT? |
SONDA
L. GIFFORD |
| SOLOMON=S
NEW SWORD: TENNESSEE=S PARENTING PLAN, THE ROLES OF ATTORNEYS,
AND THE CARE PERSPECTIVE |
WESLEY
MACK BRYANT |
|
|
| CASE
NOTE |
|
| LEGAL
ETHICSCATTORNEY CONFLICTS OF INTERESTCTHE EFFECT OF SCREENING
PROCEDURES AND THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY STANDARD ON THE
VICARIOUS DISQUALIFICATION OF A LAW FIRM |
LUKE
W. HUNT |
|
